Oakland Cops Violate The Laws Of War

Via Market Ticker

There's outrageous, then there's truly outrageous.

Beaning a guy with either a "less lethal" round in the head or (as has been more-recently claimed) a launched gas grenade is bad enough. In fact, that sure looks to me to be felonious assault and I want to know where the investigations and indictments are.

But that's not the worst of it.

Here's a guy who claims (and has the projectile extracted from his body to prove it) that he was shot with a rubber round while carrying the original wounded man.

You can't fire upon people rendering medical assistance to a soldier in combat - that's a war crime!

Never mind that the Oakland cops claim they didn't fire any rubber rounds.  So the one removed from this person's body, which he has possession of, came to be there.... exactly how?

What sort of country do we live in again?

The officer(s) involved in this outrage must stand trial.  All of them.

Occupy Phoenix: When to Kill a Cop

The Occupy groups have decided to openly come out with a "How To" guide on the justification to kill LEO.  what is amazing is that these leftie groups want to & are quoting the Constitution.

Read it all and make your own conclusions.  But it sure sounds like the things we say.

Via Hot Air

Link to PDF Flier

The letter is blatantly anti-government and anti-law enforcement in nature.  It not only condones but even encourages citizens to kill any “government agent” (i.e. law enforcement officers), who in their perception violates their rights.  Examples are given in the document, of “illegal” search and seizure, sobriety and border checkpoints, airport security, etc… In essence this document states that citizens have the right and moral obligation to resist any action by law enforcement that is viewed as a violation of the citizen’s rights, and often-times resistance involves killing officers.

 Read the comments at Hot Air.  Same ole sheeple responses.