Click the Image
Aug 23, 2012
SSDD
It all comes from the same play book.
If you know the plays, you can counteract and still win.
via Schizophrenia Bulletin
The use of psychiatry for political purposes has been a major subject of debate within the world psychiatric community during the second half of the 20th century. The issue became prominent in the 1970s and 1980s due to the systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union...
According to a position article of the Global Initiative on Psychiatry (GIP), “political abuse of psychiatry refers to the misuse of psychiatric diagnosis, treatment and detention for the purposes of obstructing the fundamental human rights of certain individuals and groups in a given society. The practice is common to but not exclusive to countries governed by totalitarian regimes.....
The political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union originated from the concept that persons who opposed the Soviet regime were mentally ill because there was no other logical explanation why one would oppose the best sociopolitical system in the world. The diagnosis “sluggish schizophrenia,” an old concept further developed by the Moscow School of Psychiatry and in particular by its leader Prof Andrei Snezhnevsky, provided a very handy framework to explain this behavior. According to the theories of Snezhnevsky and his colleagues, schizophrenia was much more prevalent than previously thought because the illness could be present with relatively mild symptoms and only progress later.....
While most experts agree that the core group of psychiatrists who developed this concept did so on the orders of the party and the Soviet secret service KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoi Bezopasnosti....
Looney Freedom
via Curtis
Wow. Do you folks see what this is saying? They aren’t talking about racism anymore. They are essentially saying that people that defend freedom of speech and the right to bear arms are the new “white supremacists!” They really expect people to be stupid enough to fall for this. This is incredible. A U.S. Army presentation is apparently saying that military members who believe in the Bill of Rights are the enemy, despite the fact that they have sworn an oath to protect that very document.
Real Reason they Arrested Raub: Strip Him of His Right to Bear Arms
Do you understand?
You can say no thank you and add all the flowery bullshit there is to be polite, BUT...
The only NO they will understand is given in excess of 1000 fps
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)